Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for Tinnitus: What Does the Evidence Show?

Behavioral Treatment · Ranked #9 on our Top 10 (weighting-sensitive)

Current evidence

The best-tested mindfulness approach for tinnitus — it outperformed a genuine comparison treatment (not just a waiting list), and the benefit lasted six months.

Evidence strength: Moderate (3/5) · Tier 2 — promising · Evidence independence: Primarily independent.

An 8-week group program combining mindfulness meditation with cognitive therapy, adapted for chronic tinnitus.

Did tinnitus loudness improve?

None shown. Loudness ratings improved equally in both trial arms — a non-specific effect, not evidence the percept quiets.

Did tinnitus distress improve?

Moderate. MBCT beat intensity-matched active relaxation training by 6.3 TQ points post-treatment (p=0.016) and 7.2 points at 6-month follow-up (p=0.006, effect size 0.56).

Loudness means the tinnitus percept itself became quieter (psychoacoustic matching or loudness ratings). Distress means questionnaire scores such as THI/TFI, sleep, anxiety or quality of life improved — the sound may be unchanged. A THI/TFI improvement is never evidence the tinnitus got quieter.

How strong is the evidence?

Beating an active control with 6-month persistence earns 3/5; multicenter replication would raise it.

Has the result been independently replicated?

Limited independent. McKenna 2017 plus smaller independent mindfulness trials; limited.

What are the limitations?

What should patients know about safety?

Safety evidence: Strong. No reported harms.

Is it available?

Regulatory status: Standard psychological therapy.

Availability: Mindfulness programs widely available; tinnitus-specific MBCT rarer · Europe: Available in specialist centers · Cost (approx.): $300–600 per 8-week group course

What the studies found

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic tinnitus: RCT

McKenna L, et al. · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · 2017 · N=75 (MBCT 39, relaxation 36) · RCT vs active control

MBCT beat active relaxation training by 6.3 TQ points post-treatment (95% CI 1.3–11.4, p=0.016, ES 0.49) and by 7.2 points at 6-month follow-up (95% CI 2.1–12.3, p=0.006, ES 0.56).

Loudness ratings improved in both arms (non-specific). The reliable-change responder difference (59% vs 44%) was not statistically significant.

PubMed 29131084 · DOI 10.1159/000478267

Related clinical trials

Tracked trials are research in progress, not recommended treatments.

Related treatments

Evidence last reviewed: 2026-09-03 · Evidence included through: 2026-09-03 · Confidence: moderate. Open the interactive evidence profile.

This page summarizes published research for education. It is not medical advice; it cannot say what will work for any individual. Discuss treatment decisions with a qualified clinician.